Page 106 - Appr

92
GRANT No.X HOMEADMINISTRATION (Contd.)
Section and Total grant Actual Excess (+)
Major Heads expenditure Saving (-)
(Rupees in thousand)
Original: 1,63,82,99
Supplementary: 64,83,31 2,28,66,30 1,40,45,65 (-)88,20,65
Amount surrendered during the year (March 2013) 88,21,19
LOANS
6216 Loans for Housing 55,53,00 22,84,44 (-)32,68,56
Amount surrendered during the year (March 2013) 32,68,57
NOTES AND COMMENTS
REVENUE
Voted
(i) The expenditure exceeded the grant by `1,66,96.12 lakh(`1,66,96,12,663); the
excess requires regularisation.
(ii) In view of the final excess of `1,66,96.12 lakh, the supplementary provision of
`1,41,44.91 lakh obtained inMarch 2013 proved inadequate.
(iii) In view of the final excess of `1,66,96.12 lakh the surrender of `2,37,52.08 lakh
was not justified.
(iv) Excess over the original plus supplementary provision occurredmainly under:
Head Total grant Actual Excess (+)
expenditure Saving (-)
(Rupees in lakh)
2055 Police
MH 001 Direction andAdministration
1.SH(03) DistrictOffices (Superintendents of Police)
O. 88,31.73
R. 38,85.57 1,27,17.30 1,27,24.26 (+)6.96
Augmentation of provision was the net effect of increase of `40,77.15 lakh and decrease
of `1,91.58 lakh. While specific reasons for the increase in provision as well as for final excess
have not been intimated, decrease in provision by `1,51.80 lakh was stated to be due to
non -commencement of works for want of administrative orders and non-receipt of requisition
from unit offices. Specific reasons for remaining decrease of `39.78 lakh have not been
intimated (August 2013).
Similar excess occurred during the years 2010-11 and 2011-12.