Page 198 - Appr

GRANT No.XIV TECHNICAL EDUCATION (ALL VOTED) (Contd.)
Head Total grant Actual Excess(+)
expenditure Saving (-)
(Rupees in lakh)
184
In view of reduction in provision under item (21) for which specific reasons have not
been intimated, obtaining supplementary provision in March 2013 for upgradation of the
scheme proved excessive.
Similar saving occurred under item (19) during the years 2009-10 to 2011-12 and under
item (20) during the year 2011-12.
(iv) The above mentioned saving was partly offset by excess under:
2203 Technical Education
MH 105 Polytechnics
1.SH(08) Government Model
Residential Polytechnics
O. 5,00.00
R. 2,99.55 7,99.55 7,99.64 (+)0.09
Augmentation in provision was the net effect of increase of `3,73.57 lakh and decrease
of ` 74.02 lakh. Specific reasons for increase and decrease in provision have not been
intimated (August 2013).
Similar excess occurred during the years 2009-10 to 2011-12.
2.SH(09) Newly Established
Government Polytechnics
O. 11,58.01
R. 22,32.98 33,90.99 33,90.99 …
Augmentation in provision was the net effect of increase of `25,42.26 lakh and
decrease of `3,09.28 lakh. Specific reasons for increase and decrease in provision have not
been intimated (August 2013).
Similar excess occurred during the year 2011-12.
CAPITAL
(i) As the expenditure fell short of even the original provision, the supplementary
provision of `17,86.69 lakh obtained in March 2013 proved unnecessary and could have been
restricted to a token provision wherever necessary.
(ii) Saving in original plus supplementary provision occurred mainly under: