SEO Version
19
GRANTNo.IIIADMINISTRATIONOF JUSTICE(Contd.)
Head
Total grant
Actual
Excess (+)
expenditure
Saving (-)
(Rupees in lakh)
Reduction in provision was the net effect of decrease of
`
47.00 lakh and an increase of
`
24.00 lakh. Decrease in provision was stated to be due to (i) non-filling up of vacancies
(ii) posting of regular Judicial Officers in place of retiredOfficers whoworked on contract basis
(iii) providing Government Quarters to some of the Officers and (iv) variation of expenditure
from time to time depending upon the number of witnesses summoned up to appear before the
courts .Out of the total increase in provision of
`
24.00 lakh, increase of
`
5.00 lakh was stated
tomeet the additional expenditure onT.A of Judicial Officers. Specific reasons for remaining
increase of
`
19.00 lakh as well as reasons for final saving have not been intimated
(August 2013).
MH 108 Criminal Courts
4.SH(11) Special Courts for dealing
C.B.I Cases
O.
1,96.02
S.
3,72.20
R.
(-)1,12.00
4,56.22
3,87.72 (-)68.50
Reduction in provisionwas the net effect o f decrease of
`
1,30.00 lakh and an increase of
`
18.00 lakh. While decrease in provision was stated to be due to non-filling up of vacancies
and some of the posts of Judicial Officers, increase in provision was stated to be mainly due
to (i) expenditure on revised property tax of court buildings in variousmunicipalities, payment of
rents of private buildings occupied by (a) Judicial Officers, where there are no Government
Quartersandnewly sanctioned courts (ii)additional expenditureonT.Aof JudicialOfficers.
Similar saving occurred during the years 2010-11 and 2011-12.
MH 114 Legal Advisers and Counsels
5.SH(04) LegalAdvisers andCounsels
O.
16,91.67
R.
(-)5,84.29
11,07.38
11,08.55 (+)1.17
Reduction in provisionwas the net effect of decrease of
`
5,84.40 lakh and an increase of
`
0.11 lakh. Out of the total decrease in provision by
`
5,84.40 lakh, decrease of
`
5,14.85
lakhwas stated to be due (i) non-filling up of vacancies (ii) late receipt of further continuation
of contract employees and (iii) non-hiring of private vehicles by the department. Specific rea-
sons for remaining decrease of
`
69.55 lakh and an increase of
`
0.11 lakh have not been
intimated.
Further, reasons for final excess have not been intimated (August 2013).
Similar saving occurred during the years 2005-06 to 2011-12.
Powered by FlippingBook Publisher